5 ms·
Okay, but you should still run ZFS because I really don't think anyone is going to make a better file system.
by jacobwilliamroy 6y ago
Okay, but you should still run ZFS because I really don't think anyone is going to make a better file system.
- aethertron 6y agoIf you don't have files, you don't need a file system http://web.archive.org/web/20081120092935/http://www.memetech.com/nofiles.html http://web.archive.org/web/20081120092935/http://www.memetec...
- jacobwilliamroy 6y agoYes. ZFS has a couple layers of caching in RAM and it actually reads from those caches first, before trying to read from disk. And then it caches whatever it has to read from disk, in RAM. That's why you need lots of ECC RAM to run ZFS. Because errors which propogate from RAM to disk cannot be corrected and such will destroy the whole file system.
- zokula 6y agoZe cult of ZFS strikes again. Comment is funny in assuming ZFS is objectively better than NTFS or APFS or FAT16.
- jacobwilliamroy 6y agoI actually use openzfs. I like it. Why are you giving me shit for that?