There is a lot of certainty in the quotes this article shares given the complete lack of hard data. > “The WFH lifestyle seems to have impacted younger employe

There is a lot of certainty in the quotes this article shares given the complete lack of hard data. > “The WFH lifestyle seems to have impacted younger employees, and overall productivity and ‘creative combustion’ has taken a hit,” What exactly is "creative combustion" and how can one measure it? > “Overall, Jamie thinks a shift back to the office will be good for the young employees and to foster creative ideas,” Kleinhanzl wrote. This is yet another remote work hit piece. There are not metrics presented, perhaps none collected, and the immeasurable "creativity" is used in place of facts. For any of these claims to have credibility the following need to presented at minimum. 1. What was measured. 2. How it was measured. 3. What the sample size was. 4. How long it was measured. 5. The delta in measurements alongside the raw data. But I suspect Dimon and his cohort don't care about credibility. They just want to find a way to rationalize their decision.