4 ms·
that would kill list building and fundraising which are large digital expenditures. non-presidentials barely spend on digital persuasion but they will spend on
by dillondoyle 6y ago
that would kill list building and fundraising which are large digital expenditures. non-presidentials barely spend on digital persuasion but they will spend on fundraising if it raises
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoKilling those things might not be a negative...
- andrewjl 6y agoDoing so would destroy the ability of non-establishment candidates representing salient issues, e.g. police violence in particular communities, from effectively running grassroots campaigns.
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoOnly if money remained the engine of political campaigns. But if others can't raise money either, then I think that helps the grass-roots candidates.
- nitrogen 6y agoPeople who already have money could just spend it directly in that world, couldn't they?
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoThey already do in this one. I will admit it would give the rich more of an edge.