4 ms·
This is cool, but I’m not sure it’s fair to claim it’s “faster” yet when it doesn’t do 95% of what jq does—-particularly the command line options. If it’s still
by skywhopper 6y ago
This is cool, but I’m not sure it’s fair to claim it’s “faster” yet when it doesn’t do 95% of what jq does—-particularly the command line options. If it’s still faster when you can match 80% of the functionality, then it might be a claim worth making.
- davesnx 6y agoExactly I didn't claim to be faster in all the cases, since there's no feature parity and I won't make it that way. For the set of operations that I implement it it's faster, that's true.