> The paradox only exists if you assume that location and path through space-time is not a property. In my understanding no such property exists and yet I do

> The paradox only exists if you assume that location and path through space-time is not a property. In my understanding no such property exists and yet I do not see any paradox. Hence the quotes around "paradox" in my previous post. > I don't claim to know whether I'm a clone, or be better than the clone. Only that a clone and the original are not the same. If that property is unobervable then why not eliminate it per occam's razor?