3 ms·
For starters, when I looked into doing this I found everyone disagreeing if it was code. I personally think it might be up to code actually If they sell those
by monstermunch 6y ago
For starters, when I looked into doing this I found everyone disagreeing if it was code. I personally think it might be up to code actually
If they sell those power inlets which are NEC approved, how can you use them without breaking code? So it MUST be code. But then you ask 10 people and get 10 answers
There are larger UPS's designed for hard-wiring, but they are almost always VERY large. I think that might be the only way to avoid an inlet cord like this
- osamagirl69 6y agoIts definitely not up to code, but that is not really a problem unless you plan to do a larger (permitted) project in the future or when you sell the house and are getting it inspected. The one thing to watch out for is that if your house does burn down (presumably due to reasons not related specifically to the non-code-compliant wiring) the insurance company will try likely try to deny your claim. At least in my jurisdiction (America) the only way to achieve what you are trying to achieve is by installing a dedicated subpanel fed by the UPS with appropriate breakers. I believe that such an installation would only be code compliant with a UPS that was designed for such an application (with a hard wired output connection, and appropriately designed disconnects), but a lenient inspector might let you get away with feeding a subpanel from an extension cord as long as as of the breakers and capacity factors work out correctly and the grounding meets code. The biggest issue I see is that the system is not labeled correctly (at all?). That is a pretty serious issue because if, for example, an emergency worker were to come into the house under the expectation that the power to the house was cut (at the service disconnect) but the house would have live outlets that are otherwise unmarked. See https://www.mikeholt.com/download.php?file=PDF/11_Generators_and_Standby_Power_Systems.pdf https://www.mikeholt.com/download.php?file=PDF/11_Generators... for more information (the relevant section for your system starts at page 16) As other commenters have pointed out, just because you can buy something that says NEC approved on the sticker does not mean that it is approved for your application. A good example mentioned elsewhere is using a 16awg SJTW extension cord to power a 15a load--all of the connectors will plug together but the combined solution is obviously not code compliant and even if it doesn't melt/catch fire it will not supply the load with clean power.
- jcrawfordor 6y agoElectrical code is complex, but more importantly there is not one unified electrical code. Your municipal, county, or state government determines what the electrical code is in your location. Usually it will be the National Electrical Code (NEC) but inclusion, but probably an older version, and then most governments have implemented various changes on top of that. So the first question to answer is what NEC allows, but you will then need to double-check for your specific context. Further, the power inlets are NEC approved but that in no way means that they are approved for this use. I'm far from an expert on the NEC but I can pretty confidently assert that it allows such inlets only for specific uses, and you would need to check carefully that what you propose is one of those uses. A very rough rule of thumb is that you are not normally allowed to have more than one "user-removable plug" on the path to a device. There are a number of exceptions to this, but any time you're plugging into something that plugs into something else, you need to check carefully if what you're doing is allowed.