2 ms·
> is it significant or is it insignificant Then a study (ideally multiple studies) should be commissioned to find this out. We shouldn't just do it because we
by falcolas 6y ago
> is it significant or is it insignificant
Then a study (ideally multiple studies) should be commissioned to find this out. We shouldn't just do it because we can, and because armchair physicists are pretty sure that it's insignificant.
Because, that's what Microsoft (and their partner) did. They did it because they could.
Remember when we, as a global society, believed that CFCs would have an insignificant impact on the environment? I do. Perhaps we should tread a bit more lightly when we're already running into species extinction and global climate change issues.
- mc32 6y agoI doubt these would add more heat than a single new volcano does, but I’m all ears. According to research[1] tectonic activity adds about 3 cubic km of magma/lava each year to the oceans (that’s 100 times the annual production by mauna loa.) [1] http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/book/export/html/138 http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/book/export/html/138
- falcolas 6y agoThis sounds a whole lot like the "global warming couldn't possibly be our fault (because: volcanoes) so let's not change anything" line of thinking, just applied to oceans instead of the atmosphere. In which case, we'll just end up talking past each other, so I'll wish you a good day.
- mc32 6y agoThis is only heat. Unless it’s releasing unbeknownst to me greenhouse liquids or gasses, it’s not the same argument.
- nwienert 6y agoSounds like a good ~2050 startup, a company that plugs volcanoes to sell green credits for underwater server farms ;)
- mc32 6y agoUnfortunately for their scheme magma would find a weakness in the crust somewhere...