5 ms·
> Creatures adapt. You're missing half the saying. Creatures adapt, or die. Given the recent articles about how species extermination is accelerating, it's a
by falcolas 6y ago
> Creatures adapt.
You're missing half the saying. Creatures adapt, or die. Given the recent articles about how species extermination is accelerating, it's a valid assumption that as many are dying as are adapting.
Not to mention, oceanic currents are propelled by heat. Changing that balance (whether by man-made resources or natural sources) could change the currents, which would impact coastal weather patterns.
https://e360.yale.edu/features/will_climate_change_jam_the_global_ocean_conveyor_belt https://e360.yale.edu/features/will_climate_change_jam_the_g...
- scrollaway 6y agoFar more of earth is covered by oceans than by land. Why are these questions more relevant when building an underwater DC than a ground-level one?
- midev 6y agoThey're not? People have asked these questions for decades, hence why they're exploring new options....
- falcolas 6y agoThey're not more relevant, but they are equally relevant. This is adding the ocean as a new layer in the overall heat dissipation stack for datacenter computing; it's impacting a whole new ecosystem that it wasn't before. Thus, we need to be asking these kinds of questions about how this will impact oceanic ecosystems.
- mc32 6y agoIt is adding... the question is how much compared to natural systems that add heat to the oceans already (in addition to sunlight, thermal vents, oceanic fissures, underwater volcanoes, etc.) is it significant or is it insignificant?
- falcolas 6y ago> is it significant or is it insignificant Then a study (ideally multiple studies) should be commissioned to find this out. We shouldn't just do it because we can, and because armchair physicists are pretty sure that it's insignificant. Because, that's what Microsoft (and their partner) did. They did it because they could. Remember when we, as a global society, believed that CFCs would have an insignificant impact on the environment? I do. Perhaps we should tread a bit more lightly when we're already running into species extinction and global climate change issues.
- mc32 6y agoI doubt these would add more heat than a single new volcano does, but I’m all ears. According to research[1] tectonic activity adds about 3 cubic km of magma/lava each year to the oceans (that’s 100 times the annual production by mauna loa.) [1] http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/book/export/html/138 http://volcano.oregonstate.edu/book/export/html/138
- falcolas 6y agoThis sounds a whole lot like the "global warming couldn't possibly be our fault (because: volcanoes) so let's not change anything" line of thinking, just applied to oceans instead of the atmosphere. In which case, we'll just end up talking past each other, so I'll wish you a good day.
- mc32 6y agoThis is only heat. Unless it’s releasing unbeknownst to me greenhouse liquids or gasses, it’s not the same argument.
- nwienert 6y agoSounds like a good ~2050 startup, a company that plugs volcanoes to sell green credits for underwater server farms ;)