2 ms·
That’s a cumbersome extra step for unclear benefit. Yes, q is supposedly faster than jq. But it is exceedingly rare for me to ever have any performance problem
by ashtonkem 6y ago
That’s a cumbersome extra step for unclear benefit.
Yes, q is supposedly faster than jq. But it is exceedingly rare for me to ever have any performance problems with jq, especially since it’s essentially a one off utility I use occasionally, not as part of the hot loop of any workflow where performance matters.
- yawaramin 6y agoIn that case I suppose you wouldn't use it.