> Aside from that, q isn't feature parity with jq which is ok at this point, but jq contains a ton of functionality that query-json misses and some of the jq o

> Aside from that, q isn't feature parity with jq which is ok at this point, but jq contains a ton of functionality that query-json misses and some of the jq operations aren't native, are builtin with the runtime. In order to do a proper comparision all of this above would need to take into consideration. > The report shows that q is between 2x and 5x faster than jq in all operations tested and same speed (~1.1x) with huge files (> 100M). While faster for somethings....that's a pretty large set of caveats!