5 ms·
>It was, but the follow-up action designed to minimize risk of loss when caught by customs rather than avoiding import of fraudulent goods blurred image of your
by hoorayimhelping 6y ago
>It was, but the follow-up action designed to minimize risk of loss when caught by customs rather than avoiding import of fraudulent goods blurred image of your intentions.
It seems pretty clear to me, I think you're missing the point of the post. It's that this person is protecting his business in a way that's effective because the government isn't, and this is what he's forced to do when dealing with agencies that claim they're looking out for his best interests.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- brendoelfrendo 6y agoCBP in this case isn't looking out for his best interest, they're looking out for the consumer's best interest. Counterfeit goods? Well, now the whole thing is suspect. It makes sense to me.
- tyingq 6y agoCounterfeit probably isn't the best word for this. It was whatever brand adapter it said it was. The UL mark was fake. After this happened I found that's pretty common. Not that it's okay, but there's tons of generic electronics on Amazon that come with adapters with a fake UL mark.
- srtjstjsj 6y agoThey are absolutely counterfeit. They don't need UL brand standards but are represented as such.