2 ms·
I fully agree with that, but I think it's a manifestation of a far wider trend that might be far more worrying. In this age of information overload, where the
by elmo2you 6y ago
I fully agree with that, but I think it's a manifestation of a far wider trend that might be far more worrying.
In this age of information overload, where the struggle for people's attention has become nothing short of warfare, I see both advocacy groups and commercial entities ever so further seek to dramatise their message, just to "maximize their reach" and not get drowned out in the sea of other sensationalized/polarized information. While this motivation or a even sense of need is understandable, with everyone "competing" only for their own interests in relationship to everything else, it essentially is a race to the bottom.
The (psychological) effects of it do (already) go a bit further than people just shrugging. On the population as a whole, it (significantly) increases stress levels, general distrust (certainly warranted), and maybe even cause a constant sense of danger or a believe that this world has gone mad. The effects of which should not be underestimated. All of which can cause both individuals and groups of people to make really poor decisions.
- luckylion 6y agoIt's essentially the tragedy of the commons, with the commons being the audience's attention and stress level.