>Have one person responsible for economic matter, one person for international affairs and the military, and one person for all other domestic policy. This is

>Have one person responsible for economic matter, one person for international affairs and the military, and one person for all other domestic policy. This is an incredibly unrealistic idea for the same reason the Commerce Clause can be used to justify anything. How do you govern international affairs without the power to oversee implementation of treaties? How do you do anything in "other domestic policy" without affecting the economy? All of those things are intrinsically linked to each other, and trying to split them apart and consider them in isolation would be catastrophic, except for the fact that it's impossible.