3 ms·
Except it isn't a straightforward relationship between production and environmental degradation. The 'how' matters quite a bit namely in terms of efficiency. To
by Nasrudith 6y ago
Except it isn't a straightforward relationship between production and environmental degradation. The 'how' matters quite a bit namely in terms of efficiency. To pretend that producing a new genetic therapy is the same as grazing one million more goats is asinine.
The awkward truth is that we have always had an impact on others even back in ancient times wrongly considered isolated arcadias in tune with their environment. Mega-fauna didn't become extinct from running out of food but from humans running out of them as food, and the Sahara fertilizes the Amazon rain forests.
- mrpopo 6y ago> To pretend that producing a new genetic therapy is the same as grazing one million more goats is asinine. You're the only one pretending that? Of course, 0-impact is impossible, except the scale at which we are destroying our environment is unprecedented. Hunting of mega-fauna has occurred over thousands of years. Two-thirds of the world’s wildlife has been lost since 1970 (70 years) : https://www.euronews.com/living/2020/09/10/wwf-proposes-plan-to-fundamentally-change-the-way-that-we-deal-with-the-loss-of-nature- https://www.euronews.com/living/2020/09/10/wwf-proposes-plan...