3 ms·
It's still an issue in that this wouldn't afford equal representation. The way the number of electors is determined is {senators + members of congress + 3}. Sin
by compycom 6y ago
It's still an issue in that this wouldn't afford equal representation. The way the number of electors is determined is {senators + members of congress + 3}. Since the senate affords massively more representation per person to rural states, rural states will be overrepresented in this system as well.
- platz 6y agosmall price to pay to unlock everyones' vote mattering instead of just a couple battleground states. Also, giving a bit more representation to less populous areas may be a feature you don't want to get rid of quite so hastily.