4 ms·
What about continuing to rely on private contractors, but with a mandate to open-source everything they develop with public funds? Perhaps that would address th
by zapita 6y ago
What about continuing to rely on private contractors, but with a mandate to open-source everything they develop with public funds? Perhaps that would address the issues you describe?
- jandrewrogers 6y agoThis does not solve the issues because it often already works that way today. All of the code I've ever written under GPL was as a private contractor to the government. The code I wrote is not supported by anyone and reflects the interests of those who paid for it. All of the most advanced systems work, even if not classified, is not open source and often not in literature and this is a condition of accessing that technology at all. For the US Federal government, they are often dysfunctional when it comes to sustainable open source. And when it comes to the more interesting computer science tech, they have no leverage to make it open source nor any real interest TBH.
- de_watcher 6y agoI've written some proprietary code and I know that my competitor contractors have written a similar thing. I don't know whether it's the way to 'create more jobs'. GPL frees individual developers from the companies. It changes the tempo of competition process because there is less of inertia.