3 ms·
It depends on what you mean by "just fine." If you mean "maintain its population," then maybe yes. But I'd say that's exceptionally low criteria for "just fine.
by beaner 6y ago
It depends on what you mean by "just fine." If you mean "maintain its population," then maybe yes. But I'd say that's exceptionally low criteria for "just fine." It's also a phrasing that dismisses the opportunity cost of having California's efficiency be raised to that of other states, and so seems disingenuous.
But even now, California's population is stagnant [0], and most likely currently shrinking. So, no, it likely cannot continue and be just fine.
[0] https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/population-shrinks-in-california-still-most-populous-state/2355776/ https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/population-shrinks-in-cal...
- jayd16 6y agoSo the success is based on population? What does that have to do with the natural resources/geography mentioned in the previous comment?
- beaner 6y agoI think my comment was pretty clear. You did not define what you meant by California being "just fine," so I said: > It depends on what you mean by "just fine." If you mean "maintain its population," If you mean something else, you should say what you mean.