3 ms·
> If this is not life, then our understanding of rocky planets is severely lacking. While I would love for this to be true, ignorance requires fewer assumption
by monkeydreams 6y ago
> If this is not life, then our understanding of rocky planets is severely lacking.
While I would love for this to be true, ignorance requires fewer assumptions than life at any level of complexity.
- gfodor 6y agoWhy would it be surprising to find bacteria next door? If life is common in the universe, this would be exactly what you’d expect. And there is plenty of reason to think life is common in the universe.
- monkeydreams 6y ago> Why would it be surprising to find bacteria next door? No one said it would be surprising (though it would to a great many people), the point is that it would require a LOT of assumptions about how life develops to get us to that point whereas human ignorance is the sole assumption we need to make to assume that these measurements are not life-related. I think life is everywhere in the universe and that we will find that it descends along a great many entropic pathways in a great many frames of reference. But I also believe any given hint of life is more likely than not going to be related to human error, only because we have so many assumptions we need to make until we understand the underlying processes better.
- glenstein 6y agoRight. This just reminds me of the news cycle from 2011 or so about a paper reporting neutrinos moving at faster-than-light speed. Which turned out to be a false alarm. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/9/110923-neutrinos-speed-of-light-particles-cern-physics-einstein-science/ https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2011/9/110923-neutri...