5 ms·
What alternative would you have proposed?
by jml7c5 6y ago
What alternative would you have proposed?
- rapsey 6y agoA language better at parallellism. Elixir or go are both easy to pick up.
- tehlike 6y agoUmm what, java supports threads what's the deal :)
- ComputerGuru 6y agoThe problem was Ruby, not Java.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- lmm 6y agoBuck up and learn enough Java to write this basic program. It's really not a particularly complex or hard language.
- CydeWeys 6y agoHow's that significantly different from the Ruby tool they did write?
- lmm 6y agoJava libraries don't tend to break in the presence of multithreading the way Ruby ones do.
- ed25519FUUU 6y ago(Sarcasm) You should “buck up” and learn Rust or C. With a real language you won’t have to deal with the overhead of a runtime and will really be able to saturate the resources.
- lmm 6y agoI can and have written Rust, C, and indeed Ruby where warranted. Surely any self-respecting programmer would do the same?
- mixmastamyk 6y agoIn other threads folks are chatting about how awesome rclone is.