3 ms·
> first because the App Store has a spotty record of stopping malware from reaching your phone Can you elaborate on this with more detail about what you're spe
by nodamage 6y ago
> first because the App Store has a spotty record of stopping malware from reaching your phone
Can you elaborate on this with more detail about what you're specifically referring to?
- saagarjha 6y agoApple let a jailbreak app on the App Store once: https://9to5mac.com/2016/08/29/reddit-jailbreak-dribbble-client-app-store/ https://9to5mac.com/2016/08/29/reddit-jailbreak-dribbble-cli.... And Charlie Miller got his developer account revoked because he showed it was easy to get malware past App Store review. In general, it's trivial to get things that break the rules past the review team; I think almost every large app is probably doing it to some extent.
- nodamage 6y agoI'm not sure I would consider a handful of examples of developers sneaking apps past the review team evidence of a "spotty record of stopping malware". Yes, you can trivially sneak things past app review by temporarily disabling disallowed features and re-enabling them once the app is released, this is literally what Epic did to get their payment processing system into Fortnite. But the fact that all app distribution goes through the App Store means that malicious apps can be disabled once discovered, and bad actors can be banned. This is important. If you compare the situation on iOS to the situation on Android the difference is night and day. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/04/solved-how-android-backdoor-called-xhelper-survives-factory-resets/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/04/solve... https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/10/20688885/agent-smith-android-malware-25-million-infections https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/10/20688885/agent-smith-andr... https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/skygofree-smart-trojan/20717/ https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/skygofree-smart-trojan/20717/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/07/virulent-auto-rooting-malware-takes-control-of-10-million-android-devices/ https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/07/virul... This type of malware is far more pernicious than an app getting snuck past review, for example rooting your phone and burying itself so deep it survives factory resets. And all of these examples were distributed directly via the web or from third-party app stores, so Google can't simply remove them from the Play Store either. If you think the App Store has a spotty record when it comes to malware I wonder how you'd describe Android or Windows.
- saagarjha 6y agoThis is not a benefit of the App Store but a benefit of a tight boot chain that largely prevents persistence.
- nodamage 6y agoNo, it's a benefit of the fact that side-loading (the most common malware attack vector on Android devices) is not possible on iOS.
- wildfire 6y agoSideloading is totally possible. It is just ordinary customers don't have the right to do so.
- nodamage 6y agoI suppose that depends on how exactly you define side-loading. I'll go ahead and clarify that I meant having a platform-sanctioned method of bypassing the default app store and instead downloading and installing third-party apps from the internet. But I think you could probably tell that from the context of the sentence.
- rolph 6y agowe need apps that can tell the difference between normal use, and a review process so as to hide functionality when appropriate and release functionality to the control of an actual user
- aerique 6y agoFunny thing is my jailbroken iPhone 3GS was probably more secure because it had a firewall and adblocker installed. A PDF exploit got fixed faster as well. That was 10 years ago though.