3 ms·
So, how much closer are we to an actual exploit with this attack? > The main advantage of the timeless timing attacks is that these are much more accurate, so
by runeks 6y ago
So, how much closer are we to an actual exploit with this attack?
> The main advantage of the timeless timing attacks is that these are much more accurate, so much fewer requests are needed.
How much fewer? And how close is this to what is achievable in practice?
- robocat 6y agoThey used it to exploit 2 known timing attacks that were not previously fixed because they were thought infeasible to attack: From article: In case of the HackerOne bug, it was already reported at least three times (bug IDs #350432, #348168, and #4701), but was not fixed, as the attack was considered infeasible to exploit. I then created a basic PoC with the timeless timing attacks. From article: Mathy Vanhoef, one of the co-authors of the paper, had previously discovered a potential timing leak in WPA3’s handshake protocol. But the timing was either too small to exploit on high-performance devices or could not be exploited against servers. “With the new timeless timing attacks, we show that it is in fact possible to exploit the WiFi authentication handshake (EAP-pwd) against servers, even if they use performant hardware,” Van Goethem says.