3 ms·

I'd like to buy "what is stockholm's syndrome for 500 alex!". https://www.britannica.com/science/Stockholm-syndrome https://www.britannica.com/science/Stockhol

I'd like to buy "what is stockholm's syndrome for 500 alex!". https://www.britannica.com/science/Stockholm-syndrome https://www.britannica.com/science/Stockholm-syndrome The better question. Are you implying this doesn't exist and therefore the woman in question is guilty? I mean, not that this has anything to do with the overarching point, but.... you're so wrong that you're wrong even when you're wrong. enter: BUT I'M GOING TO DEFINE FREEWILL SO IT DOESN'T INCLUDE STOCKHOLME SYNDROME... yeah ok.... That certainly makes you ... biased.

ColanR 6y ago
You seem incoherent. Apparently you're implying I have stockholm syndrome, which is at best an ad homenim. Then you mention some woman I've never heard of, and conclude by asserting that I'm super duper wrong...which isn't particularly informative, useful or even appropriate in a discussion. To top it off, your grammar is atrocious. EDIT: I'll ask my question again, with better wording, just for good measure. Are you suggesting that when people look for work, they accept jobs that leave them worse off than they were before?
- dang 6y ago
  "Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html