3 ms·
It's not nonsense. Market forces are made up of locally sane choices (but in a usually orthogonal aspect). Sure, it's good intentioned, but still, it pushes th
by pas 6y ago
It's not nonsense. Market forces are made up of locally sane choices (but in a usually orthogonal aspect).
Sure, it's good intentioned, but still, it pushes the needle a tiny bit, and all those add up.
Just the fact that the developer thought, okay, sure we'll just require Chrome, no biggie, instead of providing something as a browser extension or a desktop thing means that either a) for some people the functionality that this thing offers is king, so they would install even Baidu Browser too if they could just to get this functionality, or b) Chrome's market share is so dominant, that ignoring other browsers is a non-issue.
And of course Google has vast resources to win the feature war. This alone means a lot of niche products will be Chrome only. And then others can play catch-up if they want, but the first mover advantage is very big when setting web quasi-standards.
- ironmagma 6y agoIs there something preventing Firefox or Edge from adopting this API? This is how browser APIs have worked for many years. If someone doesn’t like that their browser doesn’t support speech recognition, isn’t the main party under fire the browser vendor who hasn’t prioritized the work?
- pas 6y agoI have no idea, but the Firefox dev teams are always behind the clock, so even if there's nothing conceptually blocking them, bandwidth is an issue.