I am a believer in a form of panspsychism myself, but this article is baffling. > But the problem for neo-Aristotelians, or indeed anyone who tries to ground m

I am a believer in a form of panspsychism myself, but this article is baffling. > But the problem for neo-Aristotelians, or indeed anyone who tries to ground moral truth in the natural world, is that moral truths, like mathematical truths, are necessarily true, which means that it’s impossible for them to be false. The author completely fails to prove why that is the case, not to mention that this isn't even true for Mathematics either, depending on your starting axioms...