No, because that moral argument still matters. Just because it hadn’t been adhered to in a purist sense doesn’t mean we’ve all agreed to, for example, a central

No, because that moral argument still matters. Just because it hadn’t been adhered to in a purist sense doesn’t mean we’ve all agreed to, for example, a centrally managed economy, which would be the extreme on the other end. This California law is by my estimation very invasive and bad. I come to that conclusion in part based on how much it violates the moral right to engage in commerce.