If you say something, be it positive or negative, you need to be able to back it up, so no it's not the wrong attitude. > YOU need an expert to explain why it

If you say something, be it positive or negative, you need to be able to back it up, so no it's not the wrong attitude. > YOU need an expert to explain why it CAN be used. Trying to offload onto ME the validating of YOUR claim is wrong. You claim, you back it up. Not me. > We need more skepticism, not less. Oh sure! But skepticisim isn't denial. You denied, calling it 'magic'. You back it up, with stats and science, not namecalling. > they've attempted to replicate the _HAIRSTYLE_. That I'm not stupid, I noticed that too. And I'm not stupid, I'm not going to put any faith into this until some value is shown, scientifically not via the marketing department. Don't assume I do.