3 ms·
Not that I have such images to try on so I'm just guessing: 3200 megapixels is around 200x bigger than a typical today's photo, so around 200x slower. It'd als
by Aardwolf 6y ago
Not that I have such images to try on so I'm just guessing:
3200 megapixels is around 200x bigger than a typical today's photo, so around 200x slower. It'd also still fit in e.g. 10GB of RAM.
Since applying a filter takes way less than a second on a standard photo (well, depends on what kind of filter you mean, let's say an approximated gaussian blur), single threaded, it'd be around a minute on a huge one, and with e.g. 8 or 16 threads, much faster.