You keep repeating that DNA doesn't have a strong role in determining what a person looks like. Yet everything we know about development including twin-studies

You keep repeating that DNA doesn't have a strong role in determining what a person looks like. Yet everything we know about development including twin-studies seems to suggest that in fact it has strong role. For example, this scientific article published in Nature opens with this: "The human face is a complex trait under strong genetic control, as evidenced by the striking visual similarity between twins." https://www.nature.com/articles/srep45885 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep45885 These researchers who are _specialists_ on this field have no doubt. Why do you keep casting doubt on this?