2 ms·
That’s the most facile thing I’ve ever read. Did it control for cost of living? Did it control for demographics? In 2019, and I’m using this because you can
by SamReidHughes 6y ago
That’s the most facile thing I’ve ever read. Did it control for cost of living? Did it control for demographics?
In 2019, and I’m using this because you can explore it at https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics/states/groups?grade=8 https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/mathematics/states/groups?... , Mississippi’s 8th grade math mean score was the same as New Hampshire’s, when comparing white students. Mississippi is just way less white than New Hampshire. California, also near the bottom overall, has better white performance than New Hampshire, but not as good as Massachusetts, which has always had a lot of smart people moving to Boston.
The ranking there is simply a diversity/brain drain ranking. Mississippi and California are way more diverse, so they rank low. States with nothing to attract or keep smart parents, like West Virginia, rank low too.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- someguydave 6y agoYes, the whole puzzle becomes much simpler to think about when you consider the possibility that the school scores primarily reflect the quality of students admitted, and not the quality of the education administered.