2 ms·
It's decent from an economic standpoint, but it's still environmentally wasteful, and among people buying a $300 laptop, there's probably a decent number who wo
by 43920 6y ago
It's decent from an economic standpoint, but it's still environmentally wasteful, and among people buying a $300 laptop, there's probably a decent number who would have a difficult time paying to replace it. Also, the actual hardware of laptops hasn't changed that quickly in a long time, and when compared to Windows (which runs on basically anything), and macOS (which officially runs on 7-8 year old devices, and can be patched to run on older ones), the ChromeOS update policy looks kind of silly to me. I'm writing this comment on a non-Chromebook laptop that was purchased in 2015 and still works perfectly fine; it's crazy to me that I would no longer be able to use it because of an arbitrary limit on software updates.
- boring_twenties 6y agoI have a couple of Thinkpad T60 laptops, I think they were made in 2006 or 2007. Perhaps surprisingly, they are perfectly usable for many tasks. The obvious big exception is the "modern" web, but that can actually be a benefit when you want to put in some focused time and avoid distractions. Coincidentally, a lot of my best work in the recent past has been done on one of these antiques or one of my only-slightly-newer Thinkpads. It's pretty amazing if you consider what it would be like using a 13 or 14 year old computer in 2006-7.