4 ms·
I think the point of the NPR piece is that the recycling symbols started intentionally and have continued to be for marketing. I don't think it's viable to rec
by neltnerb 6y ago
I think the point of the NPR piece is that the recycling symbols started intentionally and have continued to be for marketing.
I don't think it's viable to recycle paper products meaningfully, but they're also made from farmed trees and burn so I don't object overmuch to them. Worst case they sequester carbon...
Glass is tricky and probably cheaper to make fresh right now but it's not that big a difference to recycle it. You'd only need a marginal incentive, or for sand to somehow become more expensive.
Metal is really worth recycling economically, energetically, and technically. Glass is worth keeping separate since it can be recycled pretty easily. Paper products frankly just burn em as biofuels.
Plastics... well... I just kind of wish they didn't exist except for special applications where their unique properties were necessary. They are space age, high performance, specialty materials and we use them like they're paper cups. Use PTFE for specialty tubing, great. Use rubber tires for cars, great.
Use plastics where the properties matter. Don't use it for cups... it's just so sad...