Logically, yeah, that might represent a good reason to shine a light on the guy - but I don’t see the article mentioning those domains other than their inclusio

Logically, yeah, that might represent a good reason to shine a light on the guy - but I don’t see the article mentioning those domains other than their inclusion in a graphic. Are they actually active? Lolis.xyz doesn’t load for me. Those domains alone I would consider “smoke”, but in and of themselves aren’t necessarily nefarious. I own a variety of domains that I absolutely don’t agree with, but purchased to either resell or keep out of the hands of people who wanted them - political in my case, but still.