"Do you object out of hand to non-peer reviewed science articles regardless of quality?" In general? I find it distasteful but I don't really give that much o

"Do you object out of hand to non-peer reviewed science articles regardless of quality?" In general? I find it distasteful but I don't really give that much of a shit. Topics like nutrition or medicine have a large potential to cause bodily harm however, and I firmly believe that non-rigorous studies should not be shared with populations that don't have the capacity to understand the limitations present. Example: Shoddy studies about vaccines and the general public mix with disastrous results. All so this journalist can make a quick buck, instead of finding something more appropriate to "report" on.