3 ms·
The status quo regarding Goodreads and it's position in the industry is really interesting. There is not a single competent alternative to Goodreads, yet Goodr
by newbie578 6y ago
The status quo regarding Goodreads and it's position in the industry is really interesting.
There is not a single competent alternative to Goodreads, yet Goodreads just sucks! As simple as that, the UI is horrible, the UX is disgusting, the perfomance is that of toaster and still people are using it.
I personally am using it for the last 5 years while continuously searching unsuccessfully for alternatives.
If you think the website is bad, you should check out the Android app, never in my life have I seen a worse app by a popular company.
I got so frustrated by Goodreads that on multiple occasions I thought of starting a competing product just to challenge the status quo, but as soon as I started dwelling deeper into it, I realized that there is just no real viable business model for it to be worth it.
I guess that explains the current status of Goodreads and why there are so few competitors.
How do you monetize a social network about reading books?
I have spent way too much time thinking about it, yet failing to achieve a result.
1)You can't really sell books, since Amazon is already so well entrenched and honestly books aren't a really hot commodity.
2)Subscription for audiobooks? Again there is Audible, and Scribd is also doing a phenomenal business doing it, you pay $9 and listen to as many as you want audiobooks.
3)Affiliate marketing? Goodreads already does it, and it isn't really a business model with a good foundation.
4)Customized ads? This might be the "least" worst solution, although what could you advertise to people who read books? Their LTV (lifetime value of customers) isn't really high.
5)A paid social network? Good luck trying to grow a social network which asks it's users to pay $1 monthly.
6)The latest and craziest idea I had regarding it, was to make it a hybrid of Goodreads and LinkedIn. Where employers can see what types of books are their applicants reading. I.e. if I am looking to hire a backend intern, I am sooner going to hire the intern who read in his free time Effective Java, Clean Code, etc. since you can pretty much gain a good overall picture about a person by looking at the books he reads.
I spent way too much time obsessing over this...
- freddie_mercury 6y ago> I realized that there is just no real viable business model for it to be worth it I think this is key. It is kind of amazing that on a site all about startups and finding "product/market fit" every single thread about goodreads completely ignores any aspect of viability and expects someone else to just spend money for purely aesthetic reasons like it is a charity project. Is goodreads perfect? Good lord no. If I owned it, would I spend money trying to improve the search or the mobile app? Hell no. Hire 5 developers at $1 million/year to...what exactly? Is a better mobile app going to translate to tens of millions of dollars of revenue somehow? It isn't like LibraryThing or StoryGraph or BookSloth or Riffle are actually any good and they have 5+ years of development to solve all the alleged issues. Yet everyone in this thread complaining about Goodreads is still using Goodreads instead of them.
- rammy1234 6y agoMoney is where ideas thrive. I would build something based on recommendation based on users who you like. I like someone and I want to know the books they like and more and more of this. so essentially Facebook for Book recommendation. I know someone and so I know what books they read. User can choose to publicize the recommendation or to certain group of people or private.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]