3 ms·
> You are conflating two different things. No, I'm not conflating anything. Your claim was hyperbolic and completely false, and I refuted it. > [...] that doe
by adwn 6y ago
> You are conflating two different things.
No, I'm not conflating anything. Your claim was hyperbolic and completely false, and I refuted it.
> [...] that doesn't mean C++ is best language for optimizing i.e code written in C++ provides best opportunities for optimization.
You're moving the goalpost.
- higerordermap 6y agoYou didn't understand what I meant. I didn't move the goalpost. You understood what I meant only after reading that sentence. It is hard for one to claim compiler research is affected because of most common implementation language. I don't know why you got that interpretation. > Your claim was hyperbolic and completely false, and I refuted it. Even GPT3 writes this after getting trained on some HN pages.
- adwn 6y ago> I didn't move the goalpost. Your original claim was: "C/C++ literally killed compiler optimizations research." Your updated claim is: "C++ is [not the] best language for optimizing."