3 ms·
However, hasn't this happened just because they themselves wanted to be mobile first - mostly due to the fact that it was (and partially still is) a "virgin ter
by winterismute 6y ago
However, hasn't this happened just because they themselves wanted to be mobile first - mostly due to the fact that it was (and partially still is) a "virgin territory" in which abusing users privacy is easer? Sounds like they should only blame themselves...
- throw0101a 6y ago> However, hasn't this happened just because they themselves wanted to be mobile first Not just "mobile first", but they were iPhone-only for the first eighteen months: * https://techland.time.com/2012/04/03/no-joke-instagram-is-finally-available-for-android/ https://techland.time.com/2012/04/03/no-joke-instagram-is-fi... * https://www.cnn.com/2012/04/03/tech/mobile/instagram-android/index.html https://www.cnn.com/2012/04/03/tech/mobile/instagram-android...