4 ms·
This is correct. If some given set of landlords can get away with charging $50 more per month, they'd already be doing it. Some individual landlords might be ir
by cynicalkane 6y ago
This is correct. If some given set of landlords can get away with charging $50 more per month, they'd already be doing it. Some individual landlords might be irrational, but as a whole property isn't a market where people leave money on the table.
- LoSboccacc 6y agoif this thing works and the meth epidemic is that severe for this being a serious issue and not security theater, you'll pay the 50$ just to live in the meth free area, because the 50$ cheaper neighborhood will pool all the meatheads not overnight of course, but there will be a zoning effect at some point, as there always is, where some neighborhoods pool similarly minded people, as neither offer nor demand is really elastic.
- bananaface 6y agoSure, but it's not that severe. Meth detectors are rare, and frankly so is meth usage.
- mola 6y agoCorrect according to your model. You are talking theory and imagine you talk about truth.