4 ms·

> There is considerable scope for universities or any other organisation to ensure that assaults or even unwanted consensual activities are not taking place on

> There is considerable scope for universities or any other organisation to ensure that assaults or even unwanted consensual activities are not taking place on their property. woah i don't fully understand this or the [to you, interesting] question you posed, but I want to say that my post was satire... landlords (even university campuses) have no business meddling in 'unwanted consensual activities' as your naming suggests it is a 'consensual' activity, so there is no problem. being puritanical/prude about sex between young people is another thing. if American universities don't want people having sex in shared dorms with single-beds, then they could create European university style en-suite bedrooms that share a common area + kitchen... honestly American standards and customs scare the fuck out of me sometimes [1] [1] https://qz.com/1743640/us-abortion-politics-are-affecting-global-reproductive-health/ https://qz.com/1743640/us-abortion-politics-are-affecting-gl...

ISO-morphism 6y ago
I believe gp was referring to places where sex is already forbidden by a property owner such as classrooms and offices, where if someone walks in on you having sex, you're the weird one because you shouldn't be having sex there, someone could walk in on you, there's no expectation of privacy. It's their property and they're paying you to be there temporarily to provide a service. > landlords (even university campuses) have no business meddling in 'unwanted consensual activities' Agreed, and I think GP would as well. Dorms are different. That's your domicile, the relationship with a university is that of a landlord/tenant. You're paying for a place to sleep and live. There's an expectation of privacy. If you walk into someone's dorm while they're having sex, why the hell are you barging into someone's room? That being said seeing a sex detector hanging from the ceiling would make me sad.
- deleted 6y ago
  [deleted]

ISO-morphism 6y ago

I believe gp was referring to places where sex is already forbidden by a property owner such as classrooms and offices, where if someone walks in on you having sex, you're the weird one because you shouldn't be having sex there, someone could walk in on you, there's no expectation of privacy. It's their property and they're paying you to be there temporarily to provide a service. > landlords (even university campuses) have no business meddling in 'unwanted consensual activities' Agreed, and I think GP would as well. Dorms are different. That's your domicile, the relationship with a university is that of a landlord/tenant. You're paying for a place to sleep and live. There's an expectation of privacy. If you walk into someone's dorm while they're having sex, why the hell are you barging into someone's room? That being said seeing a sex detector hanging from the ceiling would make me sad.

deleted 6y ago
[deleted]