In theory, the law should be written such that reasonable, disinterested people can reach consensus on the outcome of cases. It can't be as unambiguous as code

In theory, the law should be written such that reasonable, disinterested people can reach consensus on the outcome of cases. It can't be as unambiguous as code and usefully describe the world, but it shouldn't require judgment based on individual opinion - that's why the pornography ruling is such a dodge. Judges should be disinterested and appealable; they are not in Apple's case.