> you'd have to ask someone who considers it to be [right] I did say why - it's because it's "functional style" so it should be done that way. I've been told t

> you'd have to ask someone who considers it to be [right] I did say why - it's because it's "functional style" so it should be done that way. I've been told this to my face. Trouble is, it's plain wrong. > so I'm not sure who would argue that functional code is "for computers". Agreed. I should not have put that.