Literally the backbone of Epic's case is the terms that Epic are breaking are illegal and so can not be enforced. The case would have been dismissed as having

Literally the backbone of Epic's case is the terms that Epic are breaking are illegal and so can not be enforced. The case would have been dismissed as having no merit if this was not at least in question. The US and EU are looking into Apple as breaching anti trust rules and you are honestly saying that for you these aren't even close: Employee ignores contract terms they know to be illegal, gets punished for it because boss doesn't think it's illegal, employee takes boss to court. and Epic ignores contract terms they know to be illegal, gets punished for it because Apple doesn't think it's illegal, Epic takes Apple to court. ?