Yeah. Although, that has an explicit error type which is good and bad. The errors are consistent and known but you're restricted to throwing them together int

Yeah. Although, that has an explicit error type which is good and bad. The errors are consistent and known but you're restricted to throwing them together into a single type. I kind of like C#'s Task type where you can still use the catch block pattern matching if you want to. Maybe dropping the catch syntax is better though.