4 ms·
The reality is that at £200k/y a suitably qualified person is taking a massive pay-cut compared to what they could make in the private sector and so would have
by dotBen 6y ago
The reality is that at £200k/y a suitably qualified person is taking a massive pay-cut compared to what they could make in the private sector and so would have to want to feel great deal of ideological or public service drive to take this role on.
Gov.uk saw a great turnover of talent under the Tories (starting with the Tory/Lib Dem coalition) as many people were simply disenfranchised/unaligned with Tory rule but also felt equally uninspired at the prospect of a Corbin government. Faced with no great outcome, people left.
Many qualified people in the private sector are going to pass, especially as you probably can't also invest or sit on the boards of other companies and all the other stuff tech execs do to further enhance their careers and wealth.
It is of no surprise to me they can't find suitably qualified folks to run this, the pool size of the intersections above (ideologically aligned with Tories, well qualified, open to pay cut) is minute.
And that's before you even consider the well made points in the other comments; that this is probably a bit of a shit job in the first place.
- ryandrake 6y agoI don't know--Ignoring the political ideology requirements, I'd guess far more than half of HN have the technical chops to do the job, and far less than half of HN make more than £200k/y.
- ghaff 6y agoVery little of a job like this is about technical chops. Oh, they should be able to understand technical issues and tradeoffs and have staff that can dive into technical details, but they're not going to be implementing technical solutions. But something like this is fundamentally a people job.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- dotBen 6y agoI've been in tech for 20 years from a software engineer through to founder, an executive and now a VC... I know the type of people who do this job and I don't think I'm suitably qualified. My time at the BBC showed that public-service/civil-service tech leadership is part people management, part political maneuvering, part vision and a small dose of any actually tech experience. It's certainly more CIO not CTO.