15 ms·

Thanks. I'm guessing (based on my knowledge of J and all its optimizations/special forms) that Dyalog APL would still be more performant too? I didn't see it

by jonahx 6y ago

Thanks. I'm guessing (based on my knowledge of J and all its optimizations/special forms) that Dyalog APL would still be more performant too? I didn't see it mentioned on the GH README.

phoe-krk 6y ago
Yes, the talk mentions that Dyalog is still much more performant, given how much time and effort has been spent on optimizing it.