4 ms·
Why do you feel discussing habitat destruction would be helpful?
by philips 6y ago
Why do you feel discussing habitat destruction would be helpful?
- pvaldes 6y agoThere is an huge difference between saving giant panda in zoos and saving the forests where giant panda lives (and all the other species of birds, flowers and mammals including pandas with it. De-extinction would be to save just one screw from a perfectly tuned and complex machine that produces more than pandas. No-extinction is better than de-extinction and also much more cheap.
- xnx 6y ago"change" feels neutral. "destruction" is always bad. There's also a lot of habitat destruction (e.g. ocean acidification) that might not fit the normal concept of "climate change". "Habitat destruction" can include things like deforestation, which would be bad even if it didn't affect climate. "Habitat destruction" might also serve as a reminder that we're destroying our own habitat as well, not just that of other plants and animals.