4 ms·
But this also excludes letting the user chose between either watching ads or paying for the content. A not very well working but reasonable business model. Wh
by dathinab 6y ago
But this also excludes letting the user chose between either
watching ads or paying for the content.
A not very well working but reasonable business model.
Why is it incompatible?
Because getting access to normally payed-extra-for content by watching apps means receiving a "monetary or other compensation"
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- a1369209993 6y ago> this also excludes letting the user chose between either watching ads or paying for the content. Good. They should clairify that content not available by paying also counts as "monetary or other compensation" for watching ads. Advertising delenda est.
- dathinab 6y agoNo not good, not everyone can or want afford paying for content. You should have the freedom to choose to pay by having ads. At least as long as it's a actually free and fair choice, i.e. the non ad payments are not overpriced.
- a1369209993 6y agoIn order to actually be a fair choice, overpriced means "greater than zero", so I suppose what you say is true, but I object to the characterization of something that you have to actively seek out for no reason other than to view it as advertising, because it dilutes the term. Advertising delenda est.