3 ms·
> Yep and then you'd be subject to what they call https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_point_of_failure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_point_of_failure.
by selykg 6y ago
> Yep and then you'd be subject to what they call https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_point_of_failure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_point_of_failure.
It's a blog, not a mission critical site. I suspect MOST blogs get so few views that it really isn't a huge deal. If you have the need for more stability and availability, then paying extra isn't a huge deal.
- ignoramous 6y ago> If you have the need for more stability and availability, then paying extra isn't a huge deal. There, that was my point: One could pay exactly somewhere in the region of $0 to Netlify and still have that.
- selykg 6y agoI see you're one of those people that base everything on price and not on other things. Got it.
- ignoramous 6y agoYou'd do better to take arguments at their merits than resort to ad hominem attacks. To your point: Yes, Ghost is much more than Hugo / Jekyll will ever be, but then again, most people aren't building a News site to actually want the features Ghost has to offer. I mean, there's absolutely a market for software like Ghost and WordPress (or they wouldn't exist, especially in WordPress' case they absolutely dominate that market), but if you're the kind to run Ghost with SQLite then may be you should instead give static site generators a look.