3 ms·
See other comments for context. It was harsh, and perhaps a little out of date, but there has been criticism of the physics prize in the past. A little moderat
by mellosouls 6y ago
See other comments for context. It was harsh, and perhaps a little out of date, but there has been criticism of the physics prize in the past.
A little moderation on both sides on this point wouldn't go amiss.
- mindcrime 6y ago> This prize isn’t too highly regarded. > there has been criticism of the physics prize in the past Those... aren't the same thing. I'm sure you could dredge up a few criticisms of the Nobel Prize in Physics as well, but would anybody say that the prize isn't highly regarded in general? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_controversies#Physics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Prize_controversies#Phys...
- mellosouls 6y agoPlease don't quote me selectively if it distorts the point. It was harsh, and perhaps a little out of date
- mindcrime 6y agoI don't see any distortion of the point. All I'm saying is that the fact that something has been criticized in the past does not (necessarily) equate to justification for a position of "it's not highly regarded".