> Epic's platform is not a monopoly even if they successfully made one Same goes for Apple. The term "monopoly" is not really useful in this discussion. It's m

> Epic's platform is not a monopoly even if they successfully made one Same goes for Apple. The term "monopoly" is not really useful in this discussion. It's more about having a small number of gatekeepers. There are currently exactly 2 gatekeepers of mobile devices in the entire world: Apple and Google. It is possible that Epic could get into a similar position as what Apple is today, but for games. My point is that I support something like this happening, even though people may think that Epic is just another gatekeeper. Gatekeepers can't be avoided, so the solution is to have more gatekeepers, so they can't abuse their power easily.