4 ms·
As with everything, you have to learn the hard way the first time. The difference though is that no other registrar I've used (6 of them) has used such an aggre
by nathanhammond 16y ago
As with everything, you have to learn the hard way the first time. The difference though is that no other registrar I've used (6 of them) has used such an aggressive tactic that breaks DNS for monetization purposes. Typically you change the default A record and you're rid of their parked page for good.
The conclusion of my post was that one should not use name.com for DNS at all, and, if you have any ethical concerns with their aggressive monetization strategy (which I do) to not use them as a registrar, either.
- humblest_ever 16y agoWho do you use? I'd like to switch.
- gommm 16y agoI have very good experiences with both namecheap and gandi... Gandi is by far my favorite but they are a bit pricy...
- ip2k 16y ago"breaks DNS for monetization purposes" It's not their DNS that is broken, it's your understanding of how nameservers work. Also, failure to read terms and conditions doesn't make it their fault. It's kind of sketchy, yeah, but no one who is serious about a site / hosting should ever use registrar-provided DNS service when it's so easy to set up with your hosting company / by yourself.